<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alexa traffic ranking and site metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://romeocayabyab.com/fx/alexa-traffic-ranking-and-site-metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://romeocayabyab.com/fx/alexa-traffic-ranking-and-site-metrics/</link>
	<description>Finance, marketing, and small business articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:21:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rom</title>
		<link>http://romeocayabyab.com/fx/alexa-traffic-ranking-and-site-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Rom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romeocayabyab.com/fx/?p=100#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

Thanks for dropping by. I think WP.com-hosted blogs are assigned their own Alexa ranking separate from the traffic ranking of WordPress.com.  For some anyway. That&#039;s one of the points that I raised - which is the inconsistency (assuming we understand what Alexa is doing) in the application of Alexa&#039;s ranking system. 

With regard to Alexa not showing its own ranking, that I really find not only interesting but amusing. Why a company would like to hide its own ranking is something I cannot understand. Alexa has assigned traffic ranks to practically all websites, and yet it does not want to reveal its own ranking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by. I think WP.com-hosted blogs are assigned their own Alexa ranking separate from the traffic ranking of WordPress.com.  For some anyway. That&#8217;s one of the points that I raised &#8211; which is the inconsistency (assuming we understand what Alexa is doing) in the application of Alexa&#8217;s ranking system. </p>
<p>With regard to Alexa not showing its own ranking, that I really find not only interesting but amusing. Why a company would like to hide its own ranking is something I cannot understand. Alexa has assigned traffic ranks to practically all websites, and yet it does not want to reveal its own ranking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Patterson</title>
		<link>http://romeocayabyab.com/fx/alexa-traffic-ranking-and-site-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romeocayabyab.com/fx/?p=100#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thats a good point. So if I am understanding you correctly, your blog that you set up on wp was a blog hosted by wp which had a completely different alexa rank than the main url of wp.com? That is odd. My alexa rank is 454,210 throughout my entire site. I am running 3 separate scripts on one url and it doesn&#039;t matter which one your on the alexa rank is the same. I also find it interesting that Alexa doesn&#039;t want their own alexa ranking to be known and that google sits at number 1. Ironic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a good point. So if I am understanding you correctly, your blog that you set up on wp was a blog hosted by wp which had a completely different alexa rank than the main url of wp.com? That is odd. My alexa rank is 454,210 throughout my entire site. I am running 3 separate scripts on one url and it doesn&#8217;t matter which one your on the alexa rank is the same. I also find it interesting that Alexa doesn&#8217;t want their own alexa ranking to be known and that google sits at number 1. Ironic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
