Comments on: The correct use of ng and nang http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/ Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:23:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Kenny Koh http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-650 Kenny Koh Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:03:40 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-650 "ng" is the correct word to use in this sentence. “ng” is the correct word to use in this sentence.

]]> By: Fritz Panganiban http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-646 Fritz Panganiban Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:05:28 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-646 ay sorry po.....tama po pla salamat pala at napractise ko ung paggamit ng "ng" at "nang" kasi ni-check ko ung tulang ginawa mo..... thanks din po dun sa author, it helps me a lot as a college student specially in our subject Filipino 1..... ay sorry po…..tama po pla

salamat pala at napractise ko ung paggamit ng “ng” at “nang” kasi ni-check ko ung tulang ginawa mo…..

thanks din po dun sa author, it helps me a lot as a college student specially in our subject Filipino 1…..

]]> By: Fritz Panganiban http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-645 Fritz Panganiban Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:51:41 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-645 Mali po yata ang paggamit nyo po ng salitang "ng" at " nang"....iba po sa discussion sa itaas Mali po yata ang paggamit nyo po ng salitang “ng” at ” nang”….iba po sa discussion sa itaas

]]> By: Levi http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-628 Levi Mon, 09 May 2011 11:15:36 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-628 2. Kung sinusundan ng pang-uri: Halimbawa: Nagtataglay ng mapanghalinang mata ang babaeng iyon. Nang makatulog ng mahimbing, nangyari ang insidente. Hindi po ba dapat ay nakatulog NANG mahimbing? Ang mahimbing ay adverb. Sinasagot nito ang tanong na paano natulog. Mahimbing. 2. Kung sinusundan ng pang-uri:
Halimbawa:
Nagtataglay ng mapanghalinang mata ang babaeng iyon.
Nang makatulog ng mahimbing, nangyari ang insidente.

Hindi po ba dapat ay nakatulog NANG mahimbing? Ang mahimbing ay adverb. Sinasagot nito ang tanong na paano natulog. Mahimbing.

]]> By: marietta http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-615 marietta Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:12:34 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-615 lagi po bang mahabang NANG ang kasunod sa mga salitang: halimbawa - wala nang; mayroon nang? exception po ba ito sa rule? lagi po bang mahabang NANG ang kasunod sa mga salitang: halimbawa – wala nang; mayroon nang? exception po ba ito sa rule?

]]> By: karina http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-612 karina Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:53:25 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-612 Wow! these are great examples...better than my daughter's highschool book. Thanks much! (I was tutoring my daughter about the differences and the examples and explanation above was so much better than the book itself) Great help indeed! Wow! these are great examples…better than my daughter’s highschool book. Thanks much! (I was tutoring my daughter about the differences and the examples and explanation above was so much better than the book itself) Great help indeed!

]]> By: Arman Gavino http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-564 Arman Gavino Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:21:24 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-564 Maraming salamat sa ibinigay ninyong artikulo. Hinanap ko ang pagkakaiba ng NG at NANG dahil nang mabasa ko ang lecture ng anak ko parang may mali, parang nakukulangan ako. Tiningnan ko ang librong gamit nya at kulang-kulang ang explanation. Kaya naman mali din ang turo ng kanyang teacher. Papano nga pala natin pwedeng itama or punahin ang isang libro? Nabalitaan ko kasi dati na may mga libro na sadyang mga mali at ni-reject ng DepEd. Maraming salamat sa ibinigay ninyong artikulo. Hinanap ko ang pagkakaiba ng NG at NANG dahil nang mabasa ko ang lecture ng anak ko parang may mali, parang nakukulangan ako. Tiningnan ko ang librong gamit nya at kulang-kulang ang explanation. Kaya naman mali din ang turo ng kanyang teacher. Papano nga pala natin pwedeng itama or punahin ang isang libro? Nabalitaan ko kasi dati na may mga libro na sadyang mga mali at ni-reject ng DepEd.

]]> By: JC John Sese Cuneta http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-497 JC John Sese Cuneta Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:03:49 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-497 The word "ng" only appeared later, to be exact, after the original Baybayin writing script of our Nation was put aside. In Baybayin, what we write today as "ng" (n-g) is correctly written as "na-ng". Why? In Baybayin, from the name itself - baybay, our characters are of the CV format. "ng" is a single Baybayin character or letter. For example, "pangngalan" when written in Baybayin is like so: pa-ng-nga-la-n. "Upang" is "u-pa-ng". "ng" is a single letter which today we still use: si-ng-si-ng; bi-tu-i-ng nasa la-ngi-t. Historically and strictly speaking, "nang" and "ng" are or were just the same: "nang" A 3 letter word even if written in Latin, why 3? A, BA, KA, DA, E, GA, HA, I, LA, MA, NA, NGA, O, PA, RA, SA, TA, U, WA, YA. Our alphabet in Latin form came from our Baybayin writing system. NGA or "NG" is a single letter - never two letters. So if we say for example: "dako ng daigdig", as far as original Tagalog (and Baybayin) is concerned, it is wrong and should be written as "dako nang daigdig". In fact, I remember reading articles and learning from Batangueños (where Tagalog came from by the way), that "ng" as we know it today is actually just a shortened form of "nang". It was only later during the "Filipino" days that the meaning of the original "nang" and "ng" were separated and defined differently. Hence the confusion even to this day. Again, historically and strictly "Tagalog" speaking (not "Filipino"), "nang" and "ng" as we know it today are one and the same. Actually, "ng" the letter (not the shortened formed) was originally written in Latin with a tilde above it. To clearly show to the reader that it is a single letter, not two. It also helps differentiate the letter "ng" from the shortened form "ng". For me, they're just one and the same, especially since I am an advocate of re-learning and putting into active use our original writing script - Baybayin. And as I've explained above, using the Baybayin glyph/letter "ng" for the word "ng" is wrong, it should be "nang". The word “ng” only appeared later, to be exact, after the original Baybayin writing script of our Nation was put aside.

In Baybayin, what we write today as “ng” (n-g) is correctly written as “na-ng”. Why? In Baybayin, from the name itself – baybay, our characters are of the CV format.

“ng” is a single Baybayin character or letter. For example, “pangngalan” when written in Baybayin is like so: pa-ng-nga-la-n. “Upang” is “u-pa-ng”. “ng” is a single letter which today we still use: si-ng-si-ng; bi-tu-i-ng nasa la-ngi-t.

Historically and strictly speaking, “nang” and “ng” are or were just the same: “nang” A 3 letter word even if written in Latin, why 3? A, BA, KA, DA, E, GA, HA, I, LA, MA, NA, NGA, O, PA, RA, SA, TA, U, WA, YA. Our alphabet in Latin form came from our Baybayin writing system. NGA or “NG” is a single letter – never two letters.

So if we say for example: “dako ng daigdig”, as far as original Tagalog (and Baybayin) is concerned, it is wrong and should be written as “dako nang daigdig”.

In fact, I remember reading articles and learning from Batangueños (where Tagalog came from by the way), that “ng” as we know it today is actually just a shortened form of “nang”. It was only later during the “Filipino” days that the meaning of the original “nang” and “ng” were separated and defined differently. Hence the confusion even to this day.

Again, historically and strictly “Tagalog” speaking (not “Filipino”), “nang” and “ng” as we know it today are one and the same. Actually, “ng” the letter (not the shortened formed) was originally written in Latin with a tilde above it. To clearly show to the reader that it is a single letter, not two. It also helps differentiate the letter “ng” from the shortened form “ng”.

For me, they’re just one and the same, especially since I am an advocate of re-learning and putting into active use our original writing script – Baybayin. And as I’ve explained above, using the Baybayin glyph/letter “ng” for the word “ng” is wrong, it should be “nang”.

]]> By: How did “The correct use of ng and nang” perform among search engines? http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-491 How did “The correct use of ng and nang” perform among search engines? Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:31:50 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-491 [...] Sometime last year, I posted an article about the correct use of “ng” and “nang”. [...] [...] Sometime last year, I posted an article about the correct use of “ng” and “nang”. [...]

]]> By: kayabyab http://romeocayabyab.com/the-correct-use-of-ng-and-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-480 kayabyab Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:14:23 +0000 http://romeocayabyab.com/?p=151#comment-480 how about for this Ika walo na nang/ng umaga how about for this

Ika walo na nang/ng umaga

]]>