Working & WordPress-ing: Tutorials for WordPress Bloggers

How to be contacted online the easy, friendly, efficient, and spam-free way

Up to now, we still see people displaying their email addresses in their blog posts. And these include columnists of major news sites which we find very disappointing.

The practice of displaying email addresses in web pages is an open invitation to spammers who use spambots which crawl on webpages to harvest anything that looks like an email address.

There are several methods to fight off spambots.

One method is to use an online contact form which obfuscates the recipient email address.

If you are using WordPress, there are a number of “contact form” plugins.

Here are two of those available in the WordPress community which we have been using in our websites:

  • WP-Spamfree eliminates comment spam, including trackback and pingback spam. The plugin includes spam-free contact form feature which can easily be installed in two minutes or less.
  • Contact Form 7 which allows you to design as many contact forms you want in your website. It also supports features like AJAX submitting, CAPTCHA, Akismet spam filtering, and file uploading.

With contact form plugins that can easily obfuscate email addresses, are you still displaying your email address on your site?

The role of internet service providers in curbing spams

spamhaus-10-worst-spam-serv

Top 10 Worst Spam Service ISPs

For those who have been following me and my blogs over any period of time, my dislike to spam is well known. I regularly post news and anti-spam tutorials as part of our company’s educational drive.

Today, I posted an entry, Australia not in Top 10 worst spam origin countries, but home to #6 spammer.

The gist of my blog is that Australia has been able to stay away from the Top 10 list because of its strong spam laws.

But governments can only do so much in fighting spam. The real key to fighting spam is the private sector’s network of internet service providers. Unless ISP networks cooperate, the fight against spam will be a losing battle.

But will networks cooperate?

The daily updates of the independent spam-tracking organisation, the Spamhaus Project, show that the positions and ranking of the world’s worst spam service ISPs keep on changing. Last May 2009, even one of the largest ISPs in the United States was in this Top 10 list, and it was ranked #6 worst spam service ISP.

Here is a part of the Spamhaus Project report :

Although all networks claim to be anti-spam, some network executives factor revenue made from hosting known spam gangs into corporate policy decisions to continue to sell services to spam operations. Others simply decide that closing the holes in their end-user broadband systems that allow spammers access would be too costly to their bottom lines.

The majority of the world’s service providers succeed in keeping spammers off their networks and work to maintain a positive anti-spam reputation, but their work is undermined daily by the few networks who, out of corporate greed or mismanagement, choose to be part of the problem.

If corporate greed, it would of course be foolish to assume that these networks will give away the proverbial “goose that lays the golden egg”. At best, they may stop servicing spam business only when cost structure arising from loss of customer support or from government lock-down pressure will be greater than the profits they derive from servicing spammers.

If mismanagement, networks have to put plugs to holes in their operations including a regular monitoring and reporting of any unusual activities in their network. Even that would mean extra costs which many ISPs will try to avoid as much as they can.

You can read more about this in my blog, A Matter of Sharing.